Showing posts with label works on paper. Show all posts
Showing posts with label works on paper. Show all posts

Monday, September 27, 2010

Interview with Steve Galloway

Sip
(click to enlarge)

West Coast artist Steve Galloway is a talented and humble man with a slightly wry sense of humor. He draws and paints strange, humorous, mysterious, sometimes dark, often irrational scenes with a very meticulous hand. Odd and compelling, these surreal landscapes envelope the viewer into the frame. The grittiness of the sand is palpable as you empathize with a lone hare in the desert. It is dry and at least 115 degrees - his thirst poignant, as is the weariness and skepticism about the reliability of the spicket having water and that snake minding its own business. In another work is unfortunate roadkill victim, Arthur. He is dead but alas, you cannot resist a smile and feel compelled to dance with the armadillo's spirit, accompanied by the skeletons of the men who killed him.

Steve Galloway has exhibited extensively and has work in many private and public collections.
He kindly answered some questions and here I share them with you.
Great Basin
(click to enlarge)

Jessica Kloville: What is your birthday and where did you grow up?
Steve Galloway: I was born in Los Angeles on March 10, 1952.
I grew up in New York with the majority of time spent in the greater Los Angeles area, mostly in the San Fernando Valley.

What first drew you to art? Was it a natural inclination beginning in childhood?
I loved to draw and can remember back for most of my life that I did so. I am not sure where, or why, this desire to draw comes from, however, in my case, it might just be some kind of escape mechanism. And maybe, a way to rearrange the world as I see it. I was always interested in the peculiar and the distorted as a child, and still am, I guess. Little eccentricities and quirks are things that seem to find their way into what I do. The play of light also had a strong influence on what interests me and how it appears as imagery.

Ghost House
(click to enlarge)

Would you mind describing some of your experience at the California Institute of the Art in the 1970s?
When I entered Cal Arts back in 1970, I was fresh from high school and about as naive as one could be. I thought I wouldn't last a week. Everyone else was more experienced and older, or so I thought. I made it through that first week. I was a delusional kid, but it worked. The first day we had an orientation of the whole school and we chanted the aum. We joked about it a lot, but later on you learn to appreciate symbolic attempts like that. The school was definitely unorthodox and rough around the edges, and that made it a perfect fit for me as I moved along. The art school was a great laboratory of possibilities, if you were self-motivated. If you needed technical instruction, Cal Arts was the wrong place. It turned out to be the right fit for me. The amount of talent at the school when I was there was very energizing. The school was very much influenced by artists and teachers from New York, so there was a sense of dynamism and rigor that we might not have had otherwise. It was place of freedom and high expectations.

Found

What is your process or the stages of a painting?
When I want to start a new work, I usually build it up from ideas that are circulating in my head. A bit like daydreaming, I suppose. If the idea works well enough, I draw it out in thumbnail form and later turn it into a larger final piece. I edit things in or out as I see the piece take form.
Some ideas need a little trimming. In retrospect they can sometimes seem born of a drunk's folly. The rest of the work on a painting or drawing is fairly simple - fill it in without falling off. Maintaining balance along the way.

How long do you tend to work on any one thing? Is it one thing until its done or many things going at the same time?
The length of time any one piece takes depends on the complexity of imagery and the size of the work. Smaller pieces, drawings in particular, take much less time than do paintings. A painting can be frustratingly slow in the manner I work, but it is a choice. Some paintings take a month or two, and some drawings might only take a day or two. In the main, I work on an individual piece solely until it is finished.
I keep a better focus on the work than shifting gears and juggling several works at the same time.

Where do you get your inspiration?...epiphanies, dreams?
Inspirations for my work come from the daily bits and pieces of life. Visual ideas, nature, news events, cultural absurdities, humorous quirks, architecture, folk stories, etc. are some things that help to form ideas for me. I have never found sleeping dreams to be of any help for my work. My ideas are waking thoughts.

Are there themes that you slowly work through?
There are some themes that course their way through my work. Some that have continued for decades and others that have dropped by the wayside.
The challenge is trying to find something new I've not done before. However, as I have gone along, I have realized that one pilfers and adapts much of what one
has done before, while still attempting some new angle conceptually. You have to be a demanding critic of your own work while allowing for audacious possibilities. It is a constant process of breaking down and building up again.
Rebelliousness is good.


(click to enlarge) (click to enlarge)

It seems like there is a personal narrative or mythology being played out. Who is B. Wilbur and what can you tell me about some other characters that appear in your work, as in Cave of 3 Bats?
Buddy Wilbur, or B. Wilbur, is an alter ego. A swamp rat and a self-taught entrepreneur of the illogical and the absurd. He came about when I needed a name for a proprietor of a swamp museum set in a drawing I did a few years back. I mumbled this name and it stuck.

The Mystery of B. Wilbur and the Swamp Bottom
(click to enlarge)

In the Cave of 3 Bats I used a guy on a lighted-sign platform that represents a well known art patron, who, when I was introduced to him while I was really in a slack period career wise, said, "You're Hot!" Nothing at that moment seemed more preposterous and ironic. He was speaking of my current career as much as he knew, I think. I laugh when I think of it. So, I placed him in the painting. The 3 bats are Cliff Westermann, Otto Dix, and Pablo Picasso. Three artists I think of often for various reasons. They are fruit bats waiting on a painting of peaches.

Cave of 3 Bats
(click to enlarge)

Some pieces are more narrative than others in that they imply human interactions, while others are made to convey more reductive ideas.

Load

All images courtesy of the artist, RoseGallery, Santa Monica, CA, and Galerie Eric Mircher, Paris, France

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Lucy WIlliams

I just discovered British artist Lucy Williams. Her work is unbelievable in its craftsmanship. These tediously constructed pieces are paper or board cut in low relief. She may include other elements to the paper sculptures to create collages with string, paint, or pillow stuffing. In all of the work she depicts architectural interior or exterior modern imagery that one generally sees in architecture books or in the likes of Dwell Magazine.

So flawless is the depiction of the scenes within, these works could easily be compared to photography or photo-realism painting in their ability to transport the viewer to the given location.





Lucy Williams artwork can be found at Timothy Taylor Gallery, London
as well as at McKee Gallery, NYC.

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Cut + Paste: Kim Rugg and Chad Person


KIM RUGG

Kim Rugg reconfigures newspapers. She doas similar work with postage stamps, comic books, and cereal boxes.







CHAD PERSON

In Chad Person's series 'Tax Cut,' he uses US currency as his medium.
(click images to enlarge)






Both artists are represented by Mark Moore Gallery in Santa Monica.

You can also find more by Chad Person on his website.
and more by Kim Rugg at Nettie Horn Gallery, her London representation.

Holly Briggs: Animal Drawings

My friend Holly is a great artist, but for some reason she does not have a website. Hopefully, I can persuade her to get something online, but in the meantime, here are some recent drawings.







Holly will be featured in Knoxville, TN's Metropulse for the next few weeks.
Here's a link to a recent interview.

Saturday, October 20, 2007

The Strange and Beautiful World of Amy Cutler


Saddlebacked, 2002

I would like to write today to bring some attention to the artist Amy Cutler. I first came across her when I found Lisa D. Freiman's book (Hatje Cantz, 2006) and immediately I was fascinated. Something about her artwork is so alluring. It must be the combination of the artist's brilliant attention to detail and the peculiar and confounding predicaments the characters find themselves in.
Her characters, all female, are confronted with situations in which they are physically bound to any number of scenarios. Any daily task, whether it be ironing, tending to chickens, or having a dinner party, becomes confounded by the fact that for those involved, one becomes a physical part of any action. The line is blurred about whether the woman or the task at hand is in control. Campers are wearing skirts that are the tents; A face is a potential birdhouse for dozens of birds; Fist fighting schoolgirls are entwined by their hair, as if they are conjoined twins from their braids' growth into one another.
detail from Two Girls and a Potbelly Stove, 2000

Cutler's precisely drawn lines and bright colors aid in illustrating a sense of whimsy. This is heightened by the fine attention to fashion, focusing on traditional and earlier styles of dress.
Whimsey contrasts with an eerie surrealism as one clearly sees the futility or ridiculousness of a given predicament.
The characters' impossible situations are almost real enough to feel and one can momentarily share in sensations of anger, frustration, or melancholy. Meanwhile, the details and colors are delightful and the compositions leave you entranced.

Sweepers, 2001

See more HERE.